1328 stories
·
23 followers

leggywillow: janiedean: arya stark, the westerosi equivalent of a gen z kid, in a casual...

1 Share

leggywillow:

janiedean:

arya stark, the westerosi equivalent of a gen z kid, in a casual conversation: yeah, i saw brienne beat the hound. what a mood. we stan a queen. wig = snatched. she just yeeted him off that cliff.

jon, a frustrated millennial who is coping with the fact that his sense of nihilism has been matched: what does that mean

davos, a baby boomer, who is trying to connect with the Youth: it means that brienne of tarth has Big Dick Energy, your grace

I would give all my money, my retirement fund, my health insurance, my home, to read this instead of the actual GoT books.

Read the whole story
rclatterbuck
8 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

darkravn: garrettauthor: animate-mush: uovoc: katedrawscomics: hypotheticalwoman: roachpatrol: ...

2 Shares

darkravn:

garrettauthor:

animate-mush:

uovoc:

katedrawscomics:

hypotheticalwoman:

roachpatrol:

zephyrantha:

aethersea:

nightfoot:

thesummoningdark:

rhys1812:

poorlydescribedpterrybooks:

amatalefay:

poorlydescribedpterrybooks:

tisorridalamor:

Describing Terry Pratchett’s books is difficult. Someone asked me what the book I was reading was about, and I had to tell them it was about banking and the gold standard, but like in a cool way with golems and action. 

 I don’t think they believed me.

welcome to the club

It is so, so difficult to explain to people that your favorite book is about transgender feminist dwarves, Nazi werewolves, and the mystery of a missing piece of really old ritual bread. And Opera saves the day.

yes, give us those sweet, sweet, terrible descriptions

A tortoise who’s really a god, finds an allegory for Jesus and they go on adventures in an ancient greece like place and then a desert 

The chief of police averts a rerun of an ancient war, partially despite and partially because of being possessed by a dying dwarf’s graffiti

It’s like Les Miserables but Javert is the good guy and also there’s time travel.  

Macbeth but it’s about the witches

Chapter one, the protagonist is hanged. Then he’s put in charge of the post office. Yes, in that order.

it’s like mulan if there were way more mulans in mulan and also pratchett is extra irritated that too many people missed the point of jingo

The bureaucrats of the universe get annoyed at the paperwork humanity causes so they decide to steal Christmas.  Replacement Christmas is done by Death and replacement Death is done by goth Mary Poppins, who is also in charge of the investigation.

these are all nice and accurate reasons to read discworld if you haven’t yet

Romeo and Juliet football AU but the other team is wizards

Hollywood????

An entire clan of tattooed, hairy, kleptomaniac, alcoholic Scotsmen decide a little girl is their new best friend whether she wants to be or not and she rescues her absolutely worthless brother by discovering the power of selfishness.

@cosmictwobyfour

Read the whole story
ojiikun
15 days ago
reply
rclatterbuck
16 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

curiousobsession101: aizawa-ally: Neither Crowley nor Aziraphale is responsible for the Tumblr...

1 Share

curiousobsession101:

aizawa-ally:

Neither Crowley nor Aziraphale is responsible for the Tumblr Titty Ban but both took credit for it when speaking to their respective superiors

I HATE HOW ACCURATE THIS IS

Read the whole story
rclatterbuck
19 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Wrong hands

1 Share

Wrong hands

Read the whole story
rclatterbuck
19 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

closet-keys: scriberat: ventrue: fidefortitude: slumbermancer: basically, i think the general...

1 Share

closet-keys:

scriberat:

ventrue:

fidefortitude:

slumbermancer:

basically, i think the general rule of thumb is: if someone REALLY wants the blood that’s inside of your body, and they’re like… a vampire, or a dracula, or some sort of mansquito, then that’s probably okay. a dracula and a mansquito are made for removing things like blood and swords from inside your body. that’s basically fine.

if something wants to get at your blood, and they’re, say, some kind of murdersaurus, or maybe a really big frog, that’s where the problems start to arise. a really frog is not made for removing blood, and your blood knows this, which is why it is so vehement about wanting to stay IN your body instead of coming out. 

unfortunately this will not deter a really big frog, because a really big frog is full of things like prizes, and value, and quite a lot of hatred, and it would REALLY rather like to replace any and all of those things with your blood, and basically by any means possible.

These words scan with a fantastic degree of confidence considering that together they make no sense at all

sometimes if you squint hard enough there are individual coherent sentences

i sent this to my philosophy teacher, and this was his reply: 

 This is a very interesting question.

There are a few ways to go about answering it that come to mind.

Considering Intent. This is kind of like the Kantian way of doing things: as long as you’re doing something for good reasons, it is OK. Conversely, doing something for bad reasons is wrong.

Dracula has arguably good reasons for sucking blood - that is how he sustains himself. He would die otherwise (or whatever the equivalent of death is for those that are undead), and we generally think that when having to choose between survival and death, it is almost never wrong to choose survival (even at the expense of another’s life - think of self-defense killing).

The mansquito likewise has arguably good reasons, assuming they need the blood for the same reasons that a Mosquito needs blood.

It is worth pointing out here how when it comes to common pests like Mosquitos, Black Flies, Deer Flies, etc., no matter how annoying they may be to us, and how much we may hate them, we do not really think that they are evil. Yeah, we wish they were wiped off the face of the Earth forever, but we don’t think that they are bad. They’re just doing what nature has programmed them to do. For the same reasons we do not say that a Tornado is evil, even if it destroys whole towns. 

So this moves us towards considering something like the “Nature” of these beings. In Philosophy this is sometimes called “Natural Law” theory. A Natural Law theory is one that proposes that there are certain natural laws, and breaking those laws is unethical. (Natural Law theory often goes hand in hand with Christian philosophy, and things like homosexuality used to be (still are, even) argued against purely from a standpoint of Natural Law - “It’s not natural!” (whatever that means).)

So again, Dracula and mansquitos are just following their natures. We can’t really fault them for it. We can be annoyed or angry, but we can’t really say that what they’re doing is bad in any real sense. The same, of course, would probably go for the Murdersaurus, whose basic nature is to murder. Again, just doing its natural duty.

The Really Big Frog is different. Assuming that a Really Big Frog is like a typical Frog except Really Big, sucking blood would be “deviant behaviour.” This is not what normal frogs do. Moreover, it is harmful to others. It’s Evil.
The problem with Natural Law theory is that it assumes usually one kind of normal behaviour, and anything that doesn’t fit that is “deviant,” wrong, weird, etc. Maybe it works when you’re talking about rocks, plants, and bumble bees, but it seems to be grossly over-reductive and restrictive when it comes to describing people and other things.

So this could move us away from this whole style of thinking, and towards something that is more individual-based. I’m thinking now of Nietzsche, and what we call in philosophy Perspectivism. This idea is like relativism, in that each person has their own perspective, which grants them their own, unique, individual style of flourishing in the world. Some people like Cats, others like Dogs, others have Ant Farms - it’s all good. So long as my own style doesn’t interfere with yours, it’s all good. And even if it does, that’s isn’t necessarily a bad thing. 

Nietzsche emphasized that it was very important that there were people in society who acted oddly, pushed at the boundaries, and generally make the majority feel uncomfortable or downright scared. This, according to Nietzsche, is the only way society can progress - by being challenged like this.
So, is Dracula a Nietzschean free spirit, challenging me by asserting that sucking blood may be a worthwhile thing to do, and that I ought to expand my horizons? Perhaps. Certainly moreso than the murdersaurus, who will probably just murder me. The Really Big Frog could be OK too. Or not, but it kind of depends on how forcefully the RBF attacks.

The OP is Jason’s ethics paper, the second comment is Tahani’s feedback, the third is Eleanor’s, and the final post is Chidi’s.

Read the whole story
rclatterbuck
19 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

mumblesbot: nuka-breaker: Power Armor is basically a fursuit for people who want to be robots sh...

1 Comment

mumblesbot:

nuka-breaker:

Power Armor is basically a fursuit for people who want to be robots

sh sshut up

Read the whole story
rclatterbuck
21 days ago
reply
This checks out
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories